Зажми картинку чтобы сохранить
The usual recipe: scrape everything, shred it into chunks, pour it into one big pile.
Then ask the pile questions and hope.
In a landfill, a peer-reviewed paper and a random forum rant sit in the same heap.
The answer you get is a smoothie of both. Nobody can say which part came from where.
"As Einstein said" – except he didn't, a blog said he did, and the pile can't tell the difference.
Once sources blend, you can't un-blend them.
Real supply chains know where every part came from. Batch, factory, date.
Knowledge deserves the same paper trail.
In a trip2g knowledge base, retrieval returns passages with their source attached.
This sentence, from this note, from this author's base. Follow the link and check.
The agent answering you quotes actual passages instead of paraphrasing a blur.
If it can't find a source, that's visible too. Silence beats invention.
Your notes carry your name through the whole chain.
When someone's agent uses your idea, it arrives as YOUR idea, not as anonymous training mulch.
Wrong answer? Trace it to the note that caused it and fix the note.
Try doing that with a pile.
This works because each base is curated by someone who cares about it.
A hundred clean bases beat one giant landfill.
Every vault you publish is either more mulch or another link in a chain.
Format decides. Attribution decides.
Landfill or supply chain. Blend or cite.
Save this for the next "AI will just know everything" conversation.